Economic Impact of British Rule in India

·       Prior to British colonial rule, India was well known for its handicraft industries dealing with cotton and silk textiles, metal and precious stone works, etc. These products manufactured in India had a worldwide market due to fine quality of material used and high standards of craftsmanship employed in the exported products.

·       With coming of British colonialism in India, the economic policies followed by British were more concerned about protection and promotion of the economic interests of their own country rather than development of Indian economy under British rule.

·       The policies followed by the company rule brought about a fundamental change in the structure of the Indian economy, transforming India into a supplier of raw materials and a consumer of finished industrial products from Britain.

  • v  economic impact of British rule in India

·       Marxist Historians, especially Rajni Palme Dutt, identified three overlapping stages in the history of imperialist rule in India.

o   The economic impact of British rule in India is also studied under these stages to assess the full meaning of British rule.

  • Ø  The first stage was : Mercantile development (1757-1813)

§  The Period of Merchant Capital (Mercantilism), also described as the Period of Monopoly Trade and Direct Appropriation (or the Period of East India Company’s Domination).

§  The East India Company began to use its political power to monopolize the trade in India. It dictated the terms of trade in its dealings with the traders and merchants of Bengal.

§  The Company imposed inflated prices of goods leading to adventurous capitalism whereby the wealth was created by the political clout of the British traders. The revenue collected from Bengal was used to finance exports to England.

  • Ø  Second phase was: Industrial phase (1813-1858)

§  This stage is also termed as Colonialism of Free Trade. It started with the Charter Act of 1813 and continued till 1860s.

§  With development of British industries, India was exploited by its colonial masters as a market for British goods. With coming of the act of 1813, only one way trade was allowed by the British, as a result of which, the Indian markets was flooded with cheap, machine-made imports from newly industrialized Britain.

o   This led to loss of Indian market and foreign market for traders of the country.

§  Indians were forced to export their raw materials to Britain and import the finished goods. They imposed heavy imports duty on the Indian products exported to England in order to discourage them in the British market.

  • Ø  Third phase was: Financial phase (1860 onwards)

§  The third stage is often described as the Era of Foreign Investments and International Competition for Colonies. It began around the 1860s in India.

§  After the British consolidated their position in India, they converted India into a market for British manufacturers while still being a supplier of foodstuffs and raw materials.

§  In the second half of the 19th century, modern machine-based industry started coming up in India. With the Introduction of Railways in 1853, and Post and Telegraph being introduced in year 1853 as well. There was a rush of foreign investment in India mainly lured by high profits and availability of cheap labour, raw materials.

§  The Banking System was introduced in form of Avadh Commercial Bank in year 1881.

§  Home grown Industries came into existence in form of Tata Iron and Steel in 1907. Socially, this led to the rise of an industrial capitalist class and a working class became important feature of this phase.

§  During this stage Liberal imperialist policies got replaced with reactionary imperialist policies which were reflected in the viceroyalties of Lytton, Dufferin, Lansdowne, and Curzon.

  • v  Economic Drain or Drain of Wealth

§  The economic drain theory was put forward by Dadabhai Naoroji in his book “Poverty And Un-British Rule in India” in 1867.

o   It stated major components of economic drain in form of salaries and pensions of civil and military officials, along with interests and loans taken by the Indian Government from abroad. Other contributors were profits from foreign investment in India, shipping payments, banking and insurance services which restricted the growth of Indian enterprise in these services.

§  This drain of wealth retarded and checked capital formation in India. While this same wealth accelerated the economic growth in British economy.

§  R C Dutta wrote in his work “Economic History of India” in year 1901 blaming British policies for Indian economic ills. These policies hampered income and employment potential within India.

§  The ‘Economic Drain’ theory mainly refers to a portion of National Product of India which was not available to Indians for consumption.

§  Following were the constituents of ‘Drain of Wealth’: -

1.      The money extorted by company servants from various rulers, zamindars, merchants as well as the common man was sent to Britain.

2.     The Duty-free trade provided to the British manufacturers gave them a competitive edge over the Indian traders. These subsidies were also financed from Indian treasury.

3.     The remittances and salaries along with other incomes sent to England by company officials working in India.

4.     ‘Home charges’ were the cost of salaries and pensions of the company officials in India, which were charged on the treasury of India.

5.     Hefty interests were paid to these British investors leading to drain of wealth.

  • v  Effects of British Rule on economic conditions:

§  The British rule stunted the growth of Indian enterprise.

§  The economic policies of British checked and retarded capital formation in India.

§  The Drain of Wealth financed capital development in Britain.

§  Indian agricultural sector became stagnant and deteriorated even when a large section of Indian populace was dependent on agriculture for subsistence.

§  The British rule in India led the collapse of handicraft industries without making any significant contribution to development of any modern industrial base.

§  Some efforts by the colonial British regime in developing the Plantations, mines, jute mills, banking and shipping, mainly promoted a system of capitalist firms that were managed by foreigners. These selfish motives led to further drain of resources from India.

To Download the Complete PDF CLICK HERE